Bloomberg reported in early December 2023 that the Chinese government has been directly investing to assist Huawei in building its chip supply chain since 2019, indicating that the ongoing uncertainties in the U.S.-China trade war, the pursuit of semiconductor industry self-sufficiency is expected to be a long-term development direction for China.

TrendForce’s insight:

1. Chinese Government Establishes Investment Fund for Huawei, Creating Exclusive Supply Chain

On May 15, 2019, when the United States announced the inclusion of Huawei and its 70 subsidiaries in the trade blacklist, the Chinese government swiftly established a fund named “Shenzhen Major Industry Investment Group” in Shenzhen, where Huawei’s headquarter is located.

This fund, directly funded by the local government, aimed primarily at creating a large supply chain for Huawei, consisting of optical factories, chip equipment developers, and chemical manufacturers.

One chip manufacturer, SiCarrier, maintained close ties with Huawei. Besides talent exchanges, the company also transferred over a dozen patented technologies to Huawei.

2. Escalating U.S.-China Trade War Drives Long-Term Semiconductor Self-Reliance in China

Recently, the Nikkei news, in collaboration with the research company Fomalhaut Techno Solutions, conducted a renewed disassembly of Huawei’s Mate 60 Pro smartphone. The findings indicate that, based on component costs, approximately 47% of the components are manufactured in China.

This contradicts the earlier claim by Chinese media of a 90% domestic production rate. Nevertheless, the Mate 60 Pro shows a noteworthy 18% increase in domestic production compared to the Mate 40 Pro in 2020.

Additionally, during the component analysis, it was reaffirmed that the self-developed 5G processor, Kirin 9000S, featured in Huawei’s Mate 60 Pro smartphone, has a circuit width of 7nm. This demonstrates China’s semiconductor technological prowess despite restrictions imposed by the U.S. ban.

However, when the semiconductor industry value chain is divided regionally, it can be observed that in the uppermost stream of the supply chain, including electronic design automation software and licensed intellectual property used in chip design, this domain is primarily concentrated in the hands of U.S. firms.

Currently, China’s overall share in the global semiconductor value chain remains relatively low and is more concentrated in downstream packaging and manufacturing. If China aims to establish a fully “self-sufficient” semiconductor supply chain, it is estimated that there is still a long way to go.

However, what is certain is that in the ongoing U.S.-China trade war, the pursuit of semiconductor industry autonomy will be a long-term development direction for China.

Read more

• Key Development Period for AI PCs in 2024; Global Notebook Market Set to Rebound to Healthy Supply-Demand Cycle with an Estimated Growth Rate of 3.2%, Says TrendForce

With China intensifying export controls, Japanese companies relying on crucial battery and semiconductor materials manufactured in China are contemplating alternative solutions. They are actively seeking materials sources to achieve supply diversification.

TrendForce’s insight:

1. Alternative Solution Cannot be Translated into Immediate Success

While countries like Japan and South Korea have swiftly initiated strategies to find alternative solutions, the majority are still in the evaluation, research, or testing stages, unable to provide immediate assistance.

Even if alternative graphite production sources outside of China, such as in North America or Australia, are identified, it is likely to increase manufacturing costs, thereby impacting the selling price or profit performance of electric vehicles.

2. Back to Negotiation with Chinese Manufacturers

The post-export control scenario may accentuate the cost advantage of Chinese battery manufacturers, influencing the effectiveness of various protective measures taken by Europe and the United States to counter Chinese electric vehicles.

Consequently, countries may ultimately realize that returning to the negotiation table with China is more practical than going through a prolonged process, aligning with China’s primary objective.

3. Material Edge Won’t Last Forever

The continuous export restrictions on critical materials by China may encourage countries to persist in developing alternative solutions. For instance, OEMs like Tesla, GM, and Stellantis are actively investing in research on rare-earth-free motors to reduce dependency on Chinese rare earths.

While currently constrained by battery material technology, graphite remains the highest-value anode material. Yet, numerous companies are also exploring anodes with higher energy density, such as silicon oxide (SiO) and lithium metal (Li Metal).

Therefore, China must recognize that material advantages may not be permanent, and the core lies in the ability for technological iteration.

Read more

• [News] Japanese Companies Seek Battery and Chip Materials Outside China

(Photo credit: Pixabay)

According to UDN’s report, the Taiwanese government has introduced the “Taiwan Chip-Driven Industrial Innovation Program,” an investment of NT$300 billion with an annual average of NT$30 billion.  On October 2, Executive Yuan Commissioner Tsung Tsong Wu and Chairperson of the National Science Council revealed that this program welcomes foreign participation but will consider prerequisites such as competition with local talent.

When asked about what attracts international startups to Taiwan, Tsung Tsong Wu emphasized that while the $30 billion investment over a decade is significant, Taiwan’s strength lies in its complete industry ecosystem, covering everything from IC design and manufacturing to packaging and testing.

The government and private sector collaborate to achieve the best results, making international startups and chip designers eager to come to Taiwan. The aim is to turn Taiwan into the global destination for related industries’ dreams.

The National Science Council presented the “Taiwan Chip-Driven Industrial Innovation Program” to the Executive Yuan on October 2. Tsung Tsong Wu explained that out of next year’s $12 billion technology budget, approximately $4 billion will be allocated to generating AI-driven innovations across all industries, attracting international investments, and supporting startups. Additionally, around $8 billion will be dedicated to strengthening talent development and advancing towards cutting-edge processes.

While the initial investment for the first year of the “Taiwan Chip-Driven Industrial Innovation Program” is $1.2 billion, critics have raised concerns about its insufficiency. The National Science Council clarified that although the initial investment is relatively low, the budget allocated will increase from 2025 onwards, adapting to the evolving economic landscape.

Tsung Tsong Wu emphasized that the program encompasses both advanced and mature processes. While Taiwan is perceived to have an advantage in advanced processes, many mature processes, such as 3DIC, are vital for future industry innovations.

(Photo Credit: TSMC)

The US Department of Commerce issued new restrictions on AI chips on October 17, 2023, with a focus on controlling the export of chips to China, including NIVIDA’s A800, H800, L40S, and RTX4090, among others. Taiwanese manufacturers primarily serve cloud service providers and brand owners in North America, with relatively fewer shipments to Chinese servers. However, Chinese manufacturers, having already faced two chip restrictions imposed by the US, recognize the significance of AI chips in server applications and are expected to accelerate their in-house chip development processes.

TrendForce’s Insights:

1. Limited Impact on Taiwanese Manufacturers in Shipping AI Servers with H100 GPUs

Major Taiwanese server manufacturering companies, including Foxconn, Quanta, Inventec, GIGABYTE, and Wiwynn, provide AI servers equipped with H100 GPUs to cloud data centers and brand owners in Europe and the United States. These Taiwanese companies have established some AI server factories outside China, in countries such as the US, the Czech Republic, Mexico, Malaysia, and Thailand, focusing on producing L10 server units and L11 cabinets in proximity to end-users. This strategy aligns with the strategic needs of US cloud providers and brand owners for global server product deployment.

On the other hand, including MiTAC, Wistron, and Inventec, also provide server assembly services for Chinese brands such as Inspur and Lenovo. Although MiTAC has a significant share in assembling Inspur’s servers, it acquired Intel DSG (Data Center Solutions Group) business in July 2023. Therefore, the focus of AI servers remains on brand manufacturers using H100 GPUs, including Twitter, Dell, AWS, and European cloud service provider OVH. It is speculated that the production ratio of brand servers will be adjusted before the new restrictions are enforced.

Wistron is a major supplier for NVIDIA’s AI server modules, DGX A100, and HGX H100. Its primary shipments are to end-users in Europe and the United States. It is expected that there will be adjustments in the proportion of shipments to Chinese servers following the implementation of the restrictions.

Compal has fewer AI server orders compared to other Taiwanese manufacturers. It has not yet manifested any noticeable changes in Lenovo server assembly proportions. The full extent of the impact will only become more apparent after the enforcement of the ban.

During the transitional period before the implementation of the chip ban in the United States, the server supply chain can still adapt shipments based on local chip demand in China to address market impacts resulting from subsequent chip controls.

2. Chinese Manufacturers Focusing on Accelerating In-House Chip Development

Chinese cloud companies had already started developing their AI chips before the first U.S. chip restrictions in 2022. This included self-developed AI chips like Alibaba Cloud’s T-HEAD, a data center AI chip, and they expanded investments in areas such as DRAM, AI chips, and semiconductors with the aim of establishing a comprehensive IoT system from chips to the cloud.

Baidu Cloud, on the other hand, accelerated the development of its third-generation self-developed Kunlun chip, designed for cloud and edge computing, with plans for an early 2024 release.

Tencent introduced three self-developed chips in 2021, including an AI inference chip called Zixiao, used for Tencent’s meeting business; a video transcoding chip called Canghai, used in cloud gaming and live streaming applications; and a smart network card chip named Xuanling, applied in network storage and computing.

ByteDance made investments in cloud AI chips through its MooreThread initiative in 2022 for applications in AI servers. Huawei released the Ascend 900 chip in 2019 and is expected to introduce the Ascend 930B AI chip in the latter half of 2024. While this chip has the same computational power as the NVIDIA A100 chip, its performance still requires product validation, and it is speculated that it may not replace the current use of NVIDIA GPUs in Chinese AI servers.

Despite the acceleration of self-developed chip development among Chinese cloud server manufacturers, the high technological threshold, lengthy development cycles, and high costs associated with GPU development often delay the introduction of new server products. Therefore, Chinese cloud companies and brand manufacturers continue to purchase NVIDIA GPUs for the production of mid to high-end servers to align with their economic scale and production efficiency.

In response to the new U.S. restrictions, Chinese cloud companies have adopted short-term measures such as increasing imports of existing NVIDIA chips and building up stockpiles before the enforcement of the new restrictions. They are also focusing on medium to long-term strategies, including accelerating resource integration and shortening development timelines to expedite GPU chip manufacturing processes, thus reducing dependency on U.S. restrictions.

In the wake of a semiconductor shortage, Chinese automakers have veered onto the path of self-developed chips over the past two years. Recently, Changan Automobile, in collaboration with the Chongqing High-Tech Industrial Development Zone and the Intelligent Manufacturing Industrial Research Institute, established Chongqing Xinlian Integrated Circuit Co., Ltd. This venture, boasting a considerable registered capital of 8.7 billion yuan, signifies a substantial investment from Chongqing’s state-owned entities and major automobile manufacturers. It is dedicated to advanced production of 12-inch large-scale integrated circuits.

Changan is not alone in this endeavor; companies like Geely, GAC, BAIC, BYD, and others have embarked on self-development plans or have chosen to enter the chip manufacturing domain through partnerships. Emerging forces in the automotive industry like XPeng, NIO, and Li Auto are also opting for self-developed chips.

The Rise of Self-Developed Chips

Tesla stands as the pioneering automaker in developing its self-driving chips. Industry insiders suggest that their decision was fueled by the inadequacy of chip suppliers like NVIDIA and the ample funds generated from Tesla’s surging sales. Their approach has been widely recognized by the market, prompting others to explore this direction.

In the realm of self-developed chips, different car manufacturers adopt diverse strategies. Companies like Tesla, XPeng, and NIO, renowned for their self-developed algorithms, focus on high-performance chips.

An industry source emphasized that car manufacturers prefer to stress full-stack self-development, but off-the-shelf chips cannot fully leverage the advantages of self-developed algorithms. Thus, powerful companies opt for customized chips to align with their proprietary algorithms. This underscores the need for automakers to possess robust capabilities in autonomous driving software and algorithms.

Notably, NIO has assembled a 300-member chip team, focusing on self-driving and LiDAR chips. XPeng’s chip team is developing high-computing power self-driving chips similar to Tesla’s FSD chip. Furthermore, Li Auto expanded its chip team and collaborated with Sanan Optoelectronics to establish a power semiconductor production line in Suzhou.

In contrast, traditional domestic auto manufacturers often commence their self-developed chip ventures with power semiconductors due to their higher onboard usage and relatively lower development complexity. Several carmakers have partnered with chip companies for mass production collaborations. Horizon Robotics, for instance, has signed mass production agreements with mainstream auto manufacturers like BYD, Great Wall, Li Auto, and Changan.

(Photo credit: Changan Automobile)